Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Today, we take a little time to talk about the topic of polysynthesis
Top of Show Greeting: Gothic (translated by Roman Rausch)
Links and Resources:
- Nootkan/Southern Wakashan grammar (featured on episode 41)
- ZBB thread on polysynthesis
- Nice Inuit article
- Iñupiatun Eskimo dictionary
- Ancient Egyptian (Amazon link)
Feedback:
Hello, I’ve posted in the comments as Panglott a couple of times. I
have a couple of episode suggestions and a small offer below. There’s
no need to read this email on the air, please 😉
I completely understand the need to go biweekly (being in grad school
myself, I’ve just been amazed at your ability to keep it going weekly
for so long). And as for suggestions for Shorts episodes, you might
ought go for really small topics, like individual words or
etymologies. Perhaps William could, in a series of Shorts episodes,
highlight some of the more interesting entries from his Conlanger’s
Thesaurus. It could be an interesting 5-minute discussion to overview
a word or idea that often has a strange or interesting semantic range.
Or even things like your discussion of 4-character poems in Chinese,
highlighting short epigrams or literary forms as a means of
developing/expressing a conlang. Are there any Esperanto-specific
literary forms?
After listening to episode 85 “Multilingual Conworlds”, I’d like to
suggest you do a long-form episode as a “Practicum on Naming
Languages”. It’s more of a beginner topic than what you ordinarily do,
but I think we’re all interested in science fiction and fantasy
writers doing more plausible and developed fictional languages. A
practicum episode on naming languages could give us a resource to
point to to say “look at that”. And I suspect there’s some demand for
more beginner-level content, as when people have requested that you
conlang live on the podcast. It could be a way to briefly review stuff
you’ve talked about in the past, and lay out a simple framework for
creating a small conlang for beginners (phonology, syllable structure,
orthography, head-initial vs. head-final compounding). And a naming
language or small sketch that is quite different from your main
language can be a great way to break out of a creative rut if you’re
“stuck” with your main language, as I recently discovered.
I’d also continue to encourage y’all to profile some of your own
languages or even your conworld settings for them, sometime. We get
hints here and there but little concrete information. After almost 2
years, it’s not self-promotion so much as connecting with your
audience 😉
<snip>
Thanks,
Panglott (Jeremiah)
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets
Nice to hear you didn’t forget to mention the Spoken French multipersonal agreement (and general move towards polysynthesis). My work here is done 😛 .
admin
Frankly, what I said in the podcast is about all I know about it. I really need to look into this process and how it’s happening. Someone needs to make a future French that is completely polysynthetic.
Chickenduck
Polysynthetic Future French sounds pretty freaking awesome. Then write some Sci-Fi for it to live in 🙂
Rhamos Vhailejh
The Polysynthetic Future French can live “in your mind”. hehehehe. (That one’s for you, William. You said it needed to be here, it’s been over a year and no one’s put it here, so now it’s in the comments. Balance has been restored. =P )
Bruce Tindall
The link to the “Nice Inuit Article” is broken, but as of July 2015 the article can be found at http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/BLS/article/view/906/688 .
The title is “Morphological Orthodoxy in Yupik-Inuit,” by Anthony C. Woodbury of U. Texas-Austin, Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 30, no. 2 (2004).